I am not here to provide an opinion in favor of Gay Sex or against it.
However, I am not OK watching the mis-information going around and top news papers (including ToI - Tabloid of India) keeping it in the front page of the news for so long !!!
Long enough for me to comment on it -----
Its very unfashionable NOT to criticize Supreme Court now after the latest ruling criminalizing "unnatural sex". So, predictably, everyone who wants to show a social face has an easy avenue now to get on the TV or newpaper to say - "its been very very wrong".
I bet my ass (pun intended) on one thing - none of these so called advocates of "Gay Sex" has read exactly what Supreme Court said ! And yes, none of them for sure even have had "gay sex" too ...
Article 377 criminalizes "Unnatural sex" - which include many other verities of immoral stuff !!
Like bestiality, pedophilia, necrophilia and not just sodomy. And it has nothing against Gay. Even if a straight couple engage in "unnatural sex" they can be (sorry not they - the MAN of the couple only ) can be jailed for 10 yrs.
Now, all supreme court did is, said that they are retaining what is there in the constitution as it is. If it has to be ratified, and the correct way of doing it would be to separate out "consensual adult gay sex" as a clause and put in the acceptable category ! But leave the 377 there with many other unnatural ones there. However the ratification is job of parliament. Not the SC.
So, what did SC do here that politicians are condemning ??? Very twisted really !!!
And the noise is about article 377.. not just "Same Sex consensual bed room activities" which is just a strand of what all it covers.
100 yrs down the line, people will become increasingly lonely. They will have foreplay over a video chat with a call center facility and then have sex with a pet sheep (bestiality). But in the privacy of their bed room ! Consensual.. Sheeps will be developed genetically to be sexier !! Some mythologists will write news paper articles that "its expression of ones freedom. Greeks did this in 14th century.. blah blah blah".
The likes of today's news makers will get on TV and FB to declare, scrap 377 ..all over again as it is Oh So natural to mount a sheep (I know some of you already feel like throwing up now .. !! ) !!
If in our mind, that day would be too much, then we should not completely abolish such a term called "Unnatual Sex" and hence 377. Yes, we can always create a a sub-clause now and make it acceptable.
So, its not SC. Its not 377. Its somewhere a subset of it, which only law makers can ratify and fix !!!
Give SC a break.. and the politicians who are blaming HC now, should just go prepare something "inclusive" of the LGBT community.
However, I am not OK watching the mis-information going around and top news papers (including ToI - Tabloid of India) keeping it in the front page of the news for so long !!!
Long enough for me to comment on it -----
Its very unfashionable NOT to criticize Supreme Court now after the latest ruling criminalizing "unnatural sex". So, predictably, everyone who wants to show a social face has an easy avenue now to get on the TV or newpaper to say - "its been very very wrong".
I bet my ass (pun intended) on one thing - none of these so called advocates of "Gay Sex" has read exactly what Supreme Court said ! And yes, none of them for sure even have had "gay sex" too ...
Article 377 criminalizes "Unnatural sex" - which include many other verities of immoral stuff !!
Like bestiality, pedophilia, necrophilia and not just sodomy. And it has nothing against Gay. Even if a straight couple engage in "unnatural sex" they can be (sorry not they - the MAN of the couple only ) can be jailed for 10 yrs.
Now, all supreme court did is, said that they are retaining what is there in the constitution as it is. If it has to be ratified, and the correct way of doing it would be to separate out "consensual adult gay sex" as a clause and put in the acceptable category ! But leave the 377 there with many other unnatural ones there. However the ratification is job of parliament. Not the SC.
So, what did SC do here that politicians are condemning ??? Very twisted really !!!
And the noise is about article 377.. not just "Same Sex consensual bed room activities" which is just a strand of what all it covers.
100 yrs down the line, people will become increasingly lonely. They will have foreplay over a video chat with a call center facility and then have sex with a pet sheep (bestiality). But in the privacy of their bed room ! Consensual.. Sheeps will be developed genetically to be sexier !! Some mythologists will write news paper articles that "its expression of ones freedom. Greeks did this in 14th century.. blah blah blah".
The likes of today's news makers will get on TV and FB to declare, scrap 377 ..all over again as it is Oh So natural to mount a sheep (I know some of you already feel like throwing up now .. !! ) !!
If in our mind, that day would be too much, then we should not completely abolish such a term called "Unnatual Sex" and hence 377. Yes, we can always create a a sub-clause now and make it acceptable.
So, its not SC. Its not 377. Its somewhere a subset of it, which only law makers can ratify and fix !!!
Give SC a break.. and the politicians who are blaming HC now, should just go prepare something "inclusive" of the LGBT community.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment